Friday, May 12, 2006
The Assignment
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Alice Munro: The Unintentional Sociologist
4/24/05
Alice Munro: The Unintentional Sociologist
Alice Munro’s work is known for portraying the many problems women face in their lives. Her work is unusual in that she often has her female characters involved in strange relationships and in uncommon situations. However what I found to be a driving theme behind her work is the independence each of the women has in the stories. Her female characters struggle to go against society’s roles. In the short story The Albanian Virgin, written by Munro, the two main characters are placed in somewhat similar situations. While their exact circumstances vary, each woman struggles to be independent. An interesting relationship between the two plots of the short stories is shown in how they coincide with one another and can be used in a sociological perspective to further view the reason for the hardships that independent women face. One plot serves as an example of how prejudices against women and the struggles they face with making their own decisions originate. The other plot serves as an instance of how this treatment has persisted through the ages and is used to show the unfair disadvantages women are given in a time period to which the reader can relate.
The two separate plots of this short story intertwine at the end. Lottar, a single woman traveling the world, is taken prisoner to a primitive village in Albania. Before her capture Munro makes several points to lead the reader to believe that she is different from other women of the time. She is unmarried, traveling the world by herself, and from her abduction it seems her adventures are dangerous. It is presumed that this side of the story is taking place in the late 19th century. This is a time when an American women to even have the thought of partaking in such an endeavourer would have been unthinkable, especially alone.
It is here, in her imprisonment that she is forced to live among the locals and partake in the chores and duties of a common woman of this village. She quickly adapts and oddly enough, becomes reluctant to escape. When she is told that she is to be forced into a marriage, the women in the village and the local priest transform her into an “Albanian Virgin.” Slightly different than our definition, a virgin in this tribe is forced to dress, walk, and talk like a man. She must participate in the jobs a common man would do and will never be allowed to marry. In almost every aspect Lottar becomes a man. The village even treats her as if they had never known the female Lottar and she had been male at birth.
Here Munro wants to show the sacrifices Lottar must make to make her own choices and have freedom. Munro uses her transformation to a man to show that the only way to truly be emancipated is to be a man. This in turn would mean that women will never be able to be treated equally. It is clear that Munro is making a statement to show her standpoint on the different advantages men are ascribed. When she transforms her character, she can clearly contrast the treatment by society when placed in the two different roles.
The other woman in the story is a single, struggling, book store owner in a somewhat more modern time period. Claire cheated on her husband and then after her husband left her she moved away from her lover to open a small business in Canada. Munro implies that the sales in the store are often low as she rarely has any customers.
While Claire may not be as rebellious as Lottar, she still shows the courage to leave both her lovers to independently open a book store in Canada. To me this seems to be somewhat risky. It also seems that she is unwelcome in the town and her relationships with the townspeople are brief as they seem to disapprove of her actions and behavior.
Carried Away, another short story written by Alice Munro, includes a female character struggling with independence as well. Louisa’s situation can be used to further understand the roles the women were placed in and why these roles result in unfair advantages. Louisa, like both Claire and Lottar, is single and seems to often travel. Neither of the women seem to have a definite plan in life and are almost seen as rebels and outcasts due to their unusual independent thinking and actions. Louisa traveled and sold merchandise for a company before finding a job running a local library for a small town. Munro suggests that Louisa is different based on her impulses and the thoughts of other characters. She is in her twenties and shows no interest in settling down to raise a family. The locals seem to think some of her characteristics are strange as well. “Independent, impulsive, longing for comfort and ritual but drawn to danger, they dump husbands, boyfriends and small-town lives on whims. Whatever regrets they have, they’re proud of their own gumption. However low they feel, they heed their own preposterous visions” (Heeger).
By examining the circumstances Lottar is placed in and social status she was given by the village, Claire, Louisa and Lottar are somewhat similar. Munro uses this setting to show the struggles of independence with women are universal. Lottar and the other women in the village have to do what they are told and the jobs that have traditionally been done for many generations. The social roles the women carry are locked in. There is little room for change in the social stratification. The only way to avoid being forced into a marriage is to become an “Albanian Virgin,” or essentially become a “man.” It is then the woman is treated entirely differently and expected to behave just as a man would.
The circumstances for women were not nearly as strange and rigid in western civilization in the early 1900’s as compared to Albania. However the reader can see that Alice Munro is showing how the roots of early civilization’s social roles persist in society today. The prejudices against women make more sense when the reader witnesses the stage which was set in Albania. Claire struggles to be on her own without the support of a relationship in her life. Being single at this time and at this point in her life is outside to the norms of society at that time.
The three women are moving against the traditional viewpoint as to how a women is supposed to act as well and the social roles they are to uphold. Their independence and struggles to make their own decisions are reflected upon society’s ideology of providing economic and social freedom to men. When the women attempts break free from this cast that has been placed on them conflict arises.
The origin of our sex roles has been examined by many sociologists in an attempt to explain this unfair treatment that has become the universal norm. Dr. John Morra, a sociologist and professor at Quinnipiac University, states that there are many aspects that explain this phenomenon. First, it must be understood that all human traits are learned. Children, both now and from early civilization, learn from a very early age the roles of each family member and are treated differently depending on their sex. This behavior forms patterns of gender behavior that persist through generations and becomes expected in any society. An example of this learned behavior is how a family would treat a male rather a female child. Parents are subconsciously rougher and expect more strength in him. Males are provided with an “anti-feminine element” (Morra), where conduct such as no crying, emotion and “sissy” like behavior is frowned upon. Other elements that thrust masculinity are the “success elements” (Morra), a boy will learn that society expects him to succeed in life on his own. Finally, the most important point for unfair treatment of genders in seen with the “self-reliant element” (Morra). This enforces the expectations that a man can do what ever he wants in life and with no help from anyone. The self-reliant element for masculinity includes the idea that a man is expected to take responsibility for a woman and take her under his wing. With this idea in a society, it is thought that a woman is simply incapable of being independent on her own. A female child will notice her mother’s role and duties within a family and then relate to her. The child witnesses that the man, her father, is responsible for the protection and support of the household. She learns her roles, along with the limitations society has placed on her.
A Functionalist perspective can further be used to observe the traditional gender roles that were so ridged in Albania. “The human infant is helpless. It is convenient that the woman takes care of the kid, and while there takes care of domestic duties. The powerful and stronger males take the jobs that require strength. The family becomes dependent on the male for food and protection. Meat and hunting thrust men into the economic system. Therefore women are dependent on men” (Morra).
An almost exact replica of this perspective is seen when Lottar lives among the primitive tribe in Albania. The males are responsible for the food and protection of the tribe and therefore are in charge. Without the men, the women would quickly perish. The responsibilities and power bestowed on the men due to sociological influences would then explain why men are given such an advantage in opportunities over women. Lottar was not allowed to make her own decisions while participating in the chores and duties of a woman. The women of the tribe could be compared to slaves, unable break fee from their ascribed status within the tribe. Alice Munro has her character, Lottar, become a “man” in the story to show the differences in how society treats her. Now that Lottar is an “Albanian Virgin,” she is free to make her own decisions and live on her own. The expectations, treatment and attitude toward her when she is a virgin compared to when she is a regular woman is tremendous. By doing this Munro provides an excellent example of the unfair treatment towards women.
To then show how this treatment relates to Alice Munro’s second plot within the “Albanian Virgin” a second perspective can be observed. The Conflict Theory Perspective, formed by the sociologist Karl Marx, explains why these unfair prejudices, struggles for independence, and sex roles have persisted. “Sexual inequality is due to the economic system and dates back one million years. An ideology is a set of beliefs that legitimates social arrangements and makes them seem natural and morally acceptable. Sexism is the ideology that men are dominant over women” (Morra). The less intense however similar situation in which Claire and Lottar are placed can by explained in this perspective. The family teaches generations gender identity which is reinforced through conditioning and imitation. Society has reserved economic and social freedom for men, and therefore giving the advantage to succeed independently, in the past which is the carried to the future.
To further the argument that Munro’s work has sociological significance a role reversal between characters could be shown. What if either Claire or Louisa were somehow transformed in the way in which Lottar was? This is done by assuming Claire and Louisa were to stay in the time period in which the plot had entailed. Imagining the transformation is now placed on them we would see a very radical change in society’s view of them. There goals, adventurous and “impulsive behavior” (Heeger) would be accepted and their community. They would be allocated more independence similar to the treatment Lottar received upon her transformation. It could be presumed that Claire and Louisa would now have a better chance for success in their lives with these advantages they were given.
While Alice Munro’s “Albanian Virgin,” serves as an almost perfect model for the Functionalism and Conflict Theory perspectives as well as the elements that perpetuate sex roles, I do not believe this was her main objective. Alice Munro’s work has many feminist qualities that serve to show the mistreatment of women. Her stories often include tales of women facing problems due to sociological injustice and the struggles women face universally (Microsoft). The main purpose for both stories, from Munro’s objectives, could be seen as a basic example of sexism and serve as an example as to why women face these problems. However this is why Munro’s work coincides so well with a sociological theory. Her feminist arguments can easily be reinforced through different sociological perspectives. If Munro’s objective truly is to show mistreatment of women, reasons for the universal occurrence and persistence of these judgments will very easily work with her writing.
Works Cited
Heeger, Susan. Pluck, Luck and Destiny Alice Munro’s short story characters live on in the mind long after the tale has been told OPEN SECRETS, By Alice Munro. Los Angeles Times. Proquest Database. 59543313. Oct 30, 1994. pg.2. 4/19/2006. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=59543313&sid=5&Fmt=3&clientld=8920&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Morra, John. “Sex and Gender Roles.” Quinnipiac University. Sociology 101 section-I. Hamden. 13 Feb. 2006.
"Alice Munro." Microsoft® Student 2006 [DVD]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation, 2005.
Munro, Alice. “The Albanian Virgin.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. 81-128
---. “Carried Away.” Open Secrets. 3-51
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
"Vanishing" In Alice Munro's Stories
“Vanishing” in Alice Munro’s Stories
Alice Munro’s “Carried Away” and “The Albanian Virgin” are short stories that entail several elements of disappearance. Her work of short stories is entitled Open Secrets to demonstrate the mysterious aspects of all of the pieces included. Although I
have only read two of her stories, criticisms provide background on several others and critics address the recurrent themes of Munro’s work. Through these criticisms, I was able to note that the disappearance, or “vanishing” of plot, characters, and important background information, is Munro’s unique style of writing. “Her writing calls attention to itself not to underscore disruption or narrative excess, but to note the narrative strategies--the conditions and contingencies--that allow the pieces to come together” (Nunes 1).
“Carried Away” was the first piece I was assigned to read in English 102. I enjoyed reading the fictional piece about love and heartbreak, but found myself completely unsatisfied when I reached the end. While reading, I found myself becoming frustrated and asking “who is the narrator at this point? Who is ‘he’ or ‘she’?” The point in the story where Louisa comes into contact with the deceased Jack Agnew is what I found to be the most bewildering. However, I did not go back and look at the text more closely; I brushed it off believing that I had just misread the piece. I was not worried; I fully expected to come to class and listen to an explanation of the story by Professor Czepiel.
Much to my surprise, at the next class meeting Professor Czepiel did not clarify who the mysterious Jack Agnew was. She asked the class for ideas and several were presented, but there was no definite answer. I was unable to realize this until much later in the semester, but this is Munro’s goal. There is no definite answer as to who this man is; it is open to many interpretations. Each reader can see it differently; no one is ever fully aware of what Munro is thinking.
When Jack Agnew is pursuing his love for Louisa, he lurks behind the bookshelves and desks at the library. He may have been there for hours every single day, but Louisa is never aware of his presence. In order to avoid direct contact with his crush, he does not check out the books he chooses to read; he steals them. Louisa never notices the “vanishing” books, and is perturbed to have them returned after his death with the cards still in them. The “vanishing” of library books symbolizes the disappearance of Jack, and with him Louisa’s hope for love. First the books disappear, then Jack dies, and when Louisa hears of his death, she is left with no hope and an everlasting feeling of emptiness.
Louisa never meets Jack Agnew. They share intimate love letters and Jack leads Louisa to believe that when he returns from the war they will be together. However, Jack does not inform Louisa of his impending marriage to Grace Horne. When Louisa hears about their engagement she is heartbroken. Nevertheless, she still longs to meet Jack in person at least once. Her dreams are crushed when he is killed, and leaves that chapter in her life incomplete. Munro writes:
She picked up each book separately, and shook it as if she expected something to fall out. She ran her fingers in between the pages. The bottom part of her face was working in an unsightly way, as if she was chewing the inside of her cheeks. (Carried Away 27)
Louisa is seeking some form of Jack’s life between the pages of these books, but it is as if every element of Jack has “vanished”, leaving Louisa at an eternal unease and dissatisfaction.
The only compensation Louisa receives for her loss of Jack is a strange encounter many years later. After surprisingly seeing his name in a program, Louisa comes across Jack in what seems to be a mere hallucinatory or dream-like happening. They entertain a brief conversation in which information regarding his own life seems to be misunderstood by Jack and leaves Louisa confused as to what has happened to him over the years.
Louisa’s feelings about her meeting with Jack are explained in great detail by Munro here:
No wonder she was feeling clammy. She had gone under a wave, which nobody else had noticed. You could say anything you like about what had happened—but what it amounted to was going under a wave. She had gone under and through it and was left with a cold sheen on her skin, a beating in her ears, a cavity in her chest, and revolt in her stomach. It was anarchy she was up against—a devouring muddle. Sudden holes and impromptu tricks and radiant vanishing consolations. (Carried Away 50)
Munro provides a few thought provoking suggestions about this occurrence between Jack and Louisa, but her clear idea is indefinite. The metaphor of the wave suggests that Louisa goes through an imagined situation which nobody can see but herself. She is delusional and seems to have a semi-psychotic episode at this point. Her hallucination consequently leads her to a sense of paranoia; a belief that the Tolpuddle Martyrs were intentionally causing her more pain. Munro actually uses the thematic term “vanishing” in this passage to express the anger Louisa feels toward the Tolpuddle Martyrs for presenting a consolation and immediately snatching it away. She does not realize that the consolation she imagined did not “vanish”, it never existed.
“The Albanian Virgin” contains numerous elements that coincide with “Carried Away.” Immediately readers can see a connection between the style, the role of women, the recurrence of books, and intricate love affairs. On the contrary, Munro applies her theme of “vanishing” in a different way to “The Albanian Virgin.” There seems to be a great deal of disappearing information as well as characters, and the emotion of hope possessed by Claire, much like it was by Louisa.
In writing “The Albanian Virgin”, Munro neglects to state that Charlotte’s story of “Lottar” is the story of her [Charlotte] own life. There are several implications, but as pertinent to her style, Munro only suggests rather than confirming it. Through her work at the bookstore, Claire gains the acquaintance of Charlotte. Although she is eager to work for Claire, Charlotte loses the clerk job offer to a college girl. After Charlotte exits the bookstore, the clerk says “’There’s something I ought to tell you about that woman’” (The Albanian Virgin 124). At this point the reader is eager to learn what the clerk tells Claire, but Munro continues with a drastic shift in scenery, and the information to be provided by the clerk “vanishes.”
Ironically, the opening of the next thread reads “That part is not of interest” (The Albanian Virgin 124). The voice of this statement is Charlotte but it is almost as if it is coming from Munro herself. She chooses to keep the statement of the clerk from the reader as it will reveal one of her secrets. Instead, Munro uses this “vanishing” text as another hint to the connection between Charlotte and “Lottar.”
The information detailing the occurring events after Charlotte and her husband Gjurdhi leave the hospital also seems to “vanish” from the plot of the story. Claire arrives at the hospital one day to visit Charlotte, and finds that she and her husband have moved on, leaving no information as to their whereabouts, and their reasons for fleeing are never revealed. Thus, another secret is entwined in these events.
Not only is the information of reasoning “vanished”, but the characters themselves disappear. Why the married couple flees is another question left to the reader. Very late in the English 102 course, I realized that Charlotte marries the Franciscan and ‘Gjurdhi’ is his real name. Again, essential information to the understanding the text is omitted. If the reader is aware of the marriage between the Franciscan and “Lottar”, it is more easily recognizable that the couple flees to escape the punishment of the kula. The fact that Charlotte was once an “Albanian Virgin” prohibits her from marrying, and she has obviously violated this law.
Claire’s story is the second thread included in “The Albanian Virgin.” Although somewhat alternative to Charlotte’s story, Claire’s life connects to the theme as it entails the “vanishing” of hope. Claire is unable to decide which man she should pursue a relationship with; her husband, Donald, or Nelson, the man whom with she is having an affair. Her hope is lost when she cannot choose between the two men, as stated here:
If I could have my love of these two men together, and settle it on one man, I would be a happy woman. If I could care for everybody in the world as minutely as I did for Nelson, and as calmly, as uncarnally as I did now for Donald, I would be a saint. Instead, I had dealt a twofold, a wanton seeming, blow. (The Albanian Virgin 114)
After Claire’s scandalous actions unfold, both Nelson and Donald flee from her life. Her marriage with Donald deteriorates, and eventually “vanishes”, leaving her without hope for love. Although eventually Nelson returns to her, Claire seems to be left without hope for love in her life, just as Louisa is left hopeless after Jack dies.
The theme of “vanishing” is taken from Mark Levene’s criticism entitled “’It was about vanishing’: A Glimpse of Alice Munro’s Stories.” Levene noted the same passage about “vanishing” that was used previously in this essay. He discusses several recurrences of “vanishing” such as absence, loss, and characters. Much of his criticism involved applying his ideas to many of Munro’s stories, which were not as easy to understand without having read them. However, the idea of “vanishing” can be considered a metaphorical gate that opens countless possibilities.
Levene also mentions writers who are similar to Munro in his criticism. Among them is Margaret Atwood. Because of their similarity in writing, Munro’s recurrent theme of “vanishing” can be applied to Atwood’s writing. Lucy, of “Death By Landscape” “vanishes” herself to escape from the restrictions of her life and her eternal discontent. Like in Munro’s writing, the reader is left to make the assumption that Lucy has jumped from the cliff to her death. However, her “vanishing”, contrary to Jack Agnew’s, is not only the concrete disappearance of her life.
Lucy’s body is never located. Therefore, her “vanishing” is of her body, her soul, and basically her entire existence. Atwood writes, “But Lucy is not in a box, or in the ground. Because she is nowhere definite, she could be anywhere” (Atwood 1106). Using Lucy’s situation and applying it to “Carried Away”, and “The Albanian Virgin” enable the application of Levene’s “vanishing” idea in a new light. Lucy’s “vanishing” is much like that of Charlotte and Gjurdhi. The couple is “nowhere definite”, and “could be anywhere.”
Mark Nunes writes another interesting criticism discussing Munro’s writing techniques. He uses an interesting metaphor to display her instances of “vanishing” text.
She appropriates textile crafts, and specifically patchwork "piecing”, as a thematic reminder of her own narrative technique. In doing so, she places herself in a complex tradition that pairs women's writing with knitting, stitching, and quilting. (Nunes 2)
This quotation also brings forth the use of women in her writing provoking questions as to how Munro views her female characters – does she disregard information because it demonstrates a poor image of the female race? One idea is that her information seems to “vanish” between the holes of her stitches of text because she is demonstrating her disapproval of the actions of women in society who are similar to Louisa, Claire, and Charlotte.
Munro has a distinct desire for unease and conflict. Readers feel a strong desire for a resolution in any short story. This is where Munro plays games with the reader’s mind—her personal function in writing. “Indeterminacy, instability, formal and situational emblems of transience—these elements suggest anything but an absolutist aesthetic and evoke more general accounts of women’s writing as ‘resistance to tradition’” (Levene 3). Levene’s criticism of Alice Munro’s works addresses her lack of an informative conclusion which is the element that to the reader seems to break the expected flow of a short story. The “vanishing” theme that Munro uses so frequently throughout her stories is the innovative idea that distinguishes her writing, making her an author of literary merit.
Acknowledgements
I would to thank the students in my English 102 class for their input and thoughts throughout the spring 2006 semester. Specifically, the remarks of Ashley Brown, Jared Lombardo, Jessica Dunlap, and Jessica Benoit have been particularly helpful on this specific essay. I appreciate their peer editing comments and assistance. I would also like to thank Professor Czepiel for her dedication to her students and teaching throughout the entire semester and aiding in the progression of my writing to this point.
Works Cited
Atwood, Margaret. “Death By Landscape.” Thinking and Writing About Literature. 2nd
Ed. Ed. Michael Meyer. Boston: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2001. 1095-1106.
Levene, Mark. “’It was about vanishing’: A Glimpse of Alice Munro’s Stories.”
University of Toronto Quarterly. 68.4. (Fall 1999). UTPJournals.com. April 18,
2006. <http://www.utpjournals.com/product/utq/684/684_levene.htm>. 1-15.
Munro, Alice. “The Albanian Virgin.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage
Contemporaries, 1994. 81-128.
----------------. “Carried Away.” Open Secrets. 3-51.
Nunes, Mark. “Postmodern ‘piecing’: ontologies Alice Munro’s contingent.” Studies in
Short Fiction. (Winter 1997). May 2, 2006. <http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2455/is_n1_v34/ai_20925782>. 1-21.
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Reader Connections
Patricia O’Malley
Prof. Czepiel
English 102
May 5, 2006
Essay IV
Munro has a very unique writing style which greatly changes the way that each reader interprets her text. She uses her fictional stories as an attempt to truly make an impact on the life or experience of the reader. Many fiction writers do not have the ability to focus on anything except the storyline. Munro, however, takes the reader further than the storyline pulling their attention away from the words on the pages, and toward the connections between the characters and the connections to the realistic parallels to their own life experiences.
Munro writes with many holes throughout her stories. She leaves these as space to keep her stories realistic, “in terms of the short story, particularly as shaped by Munro and Gallant in their concerns with absence, displacement, and the boundaries of language, art is short and so is life” (Levene par 4). Munro’s holes encourage readers to use their imaginations. In Munro’s short story, “Open Secrets,” the readers are left with a gap between the young girls on a camping trip and their friend Heather’s disappearance, to when they are older and have their own adult lives. The hole must be filled with the personal parallels of the reader by using their own life experiences as guidelines. This is what makes each reader’s experience different when reading Munro’s writing. Their own
O’Malley 2
experiences cause different lessons to be learned from each of her pieces. A reader will only pick up on the most important points of Munro’s pieces that they can relate to. This is a very unique approach to fictional writing. It is another way that she changes the normalcy of most other authors. She does not write with a purpose of telling a fictional story, but rather with a purpose of teaching life lessons that all can relate to and learn from. The gaps that she leaves also are another example of where the reader can use their imagination by forming their own connections between the characters. This can influence other relationships that the readers have within their own lives and can be applied positively and/or negatively. “The imagination, Munro implies, flattens against the rock of simple mortality and inevitable loss, producing an elegiac note in recognition of the unknowable” (Levene par 17). Each individual’s imagination will carry them to their own conclusions.
Munro’s writing can also initially be confusing to read because it jumps around a great deal. She often writes jumping between two or more different story lines. One good example of this is in her short story, “Carried Away.” The story begins with only a short plot about what Louisa is doing in her own life and then jumps into letters written from a character that we do not know. Before we are even aware of whom the other person is that Louisa is corresponding with, we are faced with another plot of a past love from Louisa’s life. The story then follows with more letters between Louisa and Jack. Before the reader gets too focused on the letters again, the story jumps back to everyday events in Louisa’s life. Although this is extremely confusing for readers at first, this technique of jumping around is very purposeful for Munro. She allows the reader only to
O’Malley 3
receive the information that they need while reading, rather than focusing too much on Louisa’s initial love interest of Jack Agnew. The story even then continues with many other plots of Louisa’s life and new love for her husband, Arthur, and then shifts back to Jack. This is also another way that Munro keeps her writing realistic. Life is not always laid out exactly how we want it to be, especially in the manner of love. By making her writing this way, it is easier for the readers to make the parallels to their own experiences. Critic Geddes says, “short-story writers see by the light of the flash; theirs is the art of the only thing one can be sure of – the present moment” (Levene par 5). When reading fiction, many readers get trapped into feeling as though they are just taking in another story, but Munro tries to change this way of seeing fictional short-stories by bringing the reader into the story itself making them a part of the experience rather than an on-looker.
Munro’s stories are often written without definite introductions or conclusions. She starts right into the stories. This is again a place where the readers must make their own inferences on the background information and result of the stories. Without background information, readers can focus more on exactly what idea Munro is trying to portray in her stories. Their minds are focused more on why things are happening within the time period presented, rather than looking to the past to find out the answers. “Although Munro refrains from using an omniscient narrator blatantly to control readers' responses to the characters and their actions” (Beran par 10). By leaving conclusions out of her stories, it is made clear that she feels it is not the author’s purpose only to tell a story with a definite ending, but rather to say something different. To show the reader that she has given you the information that you need to form the proper conclusions based on your own self both as a reader and as a person.
One example besides “Carried Away” where Munro feels no need for introduction or conclusion is in her short story “Open Secrets.” This story begins as one of young girls camping in Canada. Munro begins to describe how one of the girls goes missing then suddenly, she jumps to the future talking about the young girl’s lives as adults. At first, readers are focused on what happened to the missing girl, but as they continue to read they are drawn to forcing connections between the two other stories presented and how they can give answers to the character’s disappearance. Now the reader is no longer focusing on the original plot line, but rather trying to make connections between all the information presented. The reader must use his or her own imagination to make these connections which carries them into their own life parallels. The intended conclusion is clearer in “Open Secrets” than in “Carried Away” although it is still not directly written out. In “Open Secrets,” it is a theme of being lost. Even without technically disappearing as the character Heather Bell does, Maureen feels lost within her own life. She keeps secrets that prevent her from having a truly open lifestyle and trap her into her marriage. In “Carried Away” the theme is more unclear even at the conclusion of the text. As it’s title states, the story is about being carried away in many different aspects of a person’s life. Louisa is carried away by her different feelings for Jack and her husband. Jack is carried away by his feelings for Louisa while he is at war, even though he has a fiancée at home. Arthur is carried away by both the books that he reads and the way that they draw him into his love for Louisa. With each character’s emotional confusions throughout both of these short stories, readers can see that emotional struggle is something that all humans feel and can sometimes even give answers to some readers’ personal emotional dilemmas.
Munro chooses her titles very carefully to guide the readers. By describing the main themes in her stories in the title, the reader can have a general idea to map out their interpretations while reading. Many readers can relate to these themes that Munro presents and therefore read her writing differently than any other fictional pieces. Love is a theme that is carried throughout both “Carried Away” and “Open Secrets.” Munro shows how love can do many things to us which can be both good and bad. This is something that everyone can relate to and have an interest in making parallels to while they read. Specifically in these stories she focuses on how love takes people to a new place, whether it is an obsession with someone they can’t have as in “Carried Away” or a need to hide from someone that they are supposed to love as in “Open Secrets.” When Maureen refers to her reaction after a sexual encounter with her husband she says, “she was able to look into the bathroom mirror, and move her eyebrows, her lips and jaws, around to bring her expression back to normal” (Open 156). She only has a few times where her and her husband do express their love, but each time she is forced to pretend as though she is happy rather than escape and follow her true feelings. Keeping her true feelings inside is Maureen’s secret that is made open to us only as readers. These stories make readers think about what different emotions do to them and how much they allow them to control who they really are. Also, continuing with Munro’s gaps that she leaves in her writing, this is true of love in real life. Nothing is ever perfect, and it is unfair, therefore, to write stories as if they were perfect as well. This is a tearing of her emotions as many readers can relate to.
Many readers feel lost the first time that they are reading Munro. She writes on a level beyond what many other authors are capable of. Munro forces her readers into making connections, using not only the depth of her writing to show this, but also the structure and wording, “there is a painful tension between the story’s rhythm and our own ‘life rhythms,’ between presented, shaped narrative and our own jagged, graceless life stories” (Levene par 3). Many humans have a tendency to attempt to block out the pains or struggles within their life. They believe that by ignoring them long enough, they will simply go away. Munro is forcing the reader to look at even the painful experiences and show readers that the only way for them to truly be healed, is to face them head on. Munro uses her unique characters as avenues to show this to her readers. The main character in Carried Away, Louisa, allows herself to be distracted by a man she has never even met, Jack Agnew, through only the letters that he writes to her from war. When Arthur begins to come to the library frequently, Louisa begins to be distracted and ignores her feelings for Jack. It becomes very relateable for readers in the sense that “the romantic quality of the relationship between Louisa and Jack Agnew against the more sordid quality of her involvements with the married doctor” (Beran par 8). People with deep feelings for someone understand the hardships that Louisa faces between comparing within her heart what she believes to be her true love, Jack, and the man that she is married to. Eventually, Louisa’s ignorance catches up with her. She realizes that the life she has lead since she has last thought of Jack was not her way of moving on with her life completely, but rather her pushing him far enough back in her head only to be remembered and dealt with later. This is an example that readers can see causes emotional struggles for Louisa. When reading, people can relate these same emotions to their own experiences and learn from Munro’s characters.
When a reader is faced with making the connections to their own lives within the stories of Munro’s characters, they are forced to look at their problems from all angles. It can be scary for many readers, but it is Munro’s true goal in writing in this way. Her depth of both words and characters allows readers to make connections to her pieces in ways that they have not previously experienced. Rather than absorbing just another fictional storyline, they are reading something which forces them to use their own imaginations and experiences to be able to make parallels. Without those parallels Munro’s stories do not make sense. When someone reads a work they are always trying to make sense of it. This is what Munro uses as her key into the reader’s personal self, rather than just using them as a reader of words on a page.
There are many people that I would like to thank with their assistance to me on this essay. First I would like to thank Caroline Valdini for proof-reading my paper. Also, I would like to thank all of my classmates for assisting me in getting my ideas flowing about the pieces that we read and sparking my main idea for this piece. Finally, I would like to thank my professor, Professor Czepiel for her helpful assistance and private conferencing to make this essay as strong as I wanted it to be.
Works Cited
Beran, Carol L. “Thomas Hardy, Alice Munro, and the question of influence.”
American Review of Canadian Studies. Infotrac. (Summer 1999).
1-19.
Geddes, Gary. ed. The Art of Short Fiction: An International Anthology. Toronto:
HarperCollins 1993. qtd. in Mark Levene. “ ‘It was about Vanishing’: A Glimpse
of Alice Munro’s Stories.” University of Toronto Quarterly 68.4 (Fall 1999). UTPJournals.com. 1-15. Feb. 13 2006.
Levene, Mark. “ ‘It was about Vanishing’: A Glimpse of Alice Munro’s Stories.”
Munro, Alice. “Carried Away.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. 3-51.
---. “Open Secrets.” Open Secrets. 129-160.
Monday, May 08, 2006
Women's Ambivalence
English 102
Final Essay
Women’s Ambivalence
Open Secrets, by Alice Munro, is a collection of short stories that reflect not only her ability to produce realistic characters but also realistic themes that circulate throughout each anecdote. Both “Carried Away” and “The Albanian Virgin” can be strung together on a clothesline of similarity. Although, like any two stories, they have their differences, their themes are strikingly similar which include the use of literature, feminism, and secrets. However, what seems the most prevalent is an ongoing theme of women struggling with their own independence, while maintaining a dependence on men. Author of a book review on Alice Munro’s Open Secrets, Susan Heeger, calls the female characters “[i]ndependent, impulsive, longing for comfort and ritual but drawn to danger” (Heeger). She reinforces the idea that the heroines in both “Carried Away” and “The Albanian Virgin” have an ambivalence regarding the way they wish to view themselves and a yearning they cannot deny.
In “Carried Away” Louisa demonstrates her co-existing and contradictory feelings in numerous ways. At first, when Louisa is introduced, Munro describes her as a stranger to Carstairs and with no connection to anyone. It seems she does not rely on another person for her simple existence at the Commercial Hotel. Readers find out that Louisa was a traveling saleswoman but then settles down in Carstairs, Ontario as the town librarian. This screams independence, because she makes the decision herself to travel to Carstairs and remains there without any connection to a man. Then readers discover there was a motive behind her relocation. When Louisa was in a sanitorium recovering from tuberculosis, she had a relationship with a married doctor. She then became a traveling saleswoman to escape the anguish the relationship would eventually cause her. The doctor writes letters but she requests a termination of their correspondence. This also signals an attempt at independence. However, Munro reveals that when Louisa arrives home after traveling all week, she secretly hoped for another letter from the doctor, meaning that she was dependent on the doctor for satisfaction.
After Louisa was settled in Carstairs, she began to receive letters from a soldier overseas, Jack Agnew, who had admired her from afar, as a regular at the Library. Louisa once again falls in love with a man, very much as unavailable as the first, through the letters. In the beginning, she seems unattached and wary, but then falls prey to his advances. Despite the attack of the flu on the town of Carstairs, Louisa keeps the library open. People of the town recognize this as courageous. Her friend, Jim Frarey says to her, “Life can’t be brought to a standstill all the same… You did the right thing, keeping the library open” (Carried Away 14). Although this looks as if she was being a strong, independent woman, she really had other objectives in mind. Louisa in turn, says to him, “Oh, it was not a matter of principle…That I kept the library open. It was a more personal reason than you think” (Carried Away 15). Louisa confesses that she had hoped that Jack would stop by and she would finally get to meet her soldier.
Munro’s section titled “Tolpuddle Martyrs” also signifies a level of Louisa’s emotional dependence on men, despite her attempts to be independent. After the death of her husband, Arthur, Louisa takes the bus to see the heart specialist. She goes alone, sees the doctor, and then contemplates what activity to do why she waits. When I first read this, it seemed that Louisa was back to her old self when she first arrived in Carstairs, traveling and doing activities alone. However, the appearance of Jack set off an alarm of unfinished business and a lack of closure. Carol L. Beran, author of “Thomas Hardy, Alice Munro, and the Question of Influence,” seems to agree by writing “Louisa has a good spouse, a family (a son plus a stepdaughter), and a comfortable lifestyle. If the story stopped here, its ending would seem happy. The actual ending is upsetting; since Jack's reappearance hints that something is missing” (Beran). At the beginning of this section, readers might conclude that the story was coming to a conclusion, but then Munro throws in Jack’s appearance as a surprising twist. She seems to be alone, independent, and strong going to a doctor appointment far away by herself. However, she seems to still be holding on to a hope that she’ll see Jack and finally feel comfort, something that she could not provide by herself.
Munro’s female characters in “The Albanian Virgin,” seem to mirror some of Louisa’s actions in “Carried Away.” The story is first introduced with the presence of Lottar, a woman who was taken to a small village in Albania when her guide was shot. She reluctantly became apart of their village and eventually was subjected to marrying a Muslim, in exchange for money. However, the Franciscan, Lottar’s mentor in the village, steps in and suggests she becomes a “virgin” which will make her celibate, self-sufficient, and protected from an undesirable marriage. Once again, one of Munro’s characters, becomes independent, but only after a male intervenes. This is very similar to Louisa, who gets a job in a completely new place after separating herself from an unavailable man. The plot, in “The Albanian Virgin” then turns to Claire, whose independence is also triggered by a failing relationship. She cheats on her husband with her married tenant. Even though Nelson was willing to leave his wife for Claire, she was still unhappy, so she leaves him suddenly to start up a book store, far away from him and her husband. She lives by herself, struggling with remorse from her unsuccessful marriage and still pining for Nelson, but still managing to open up her own bookstore.
Although many of Munro’s heroines attempt to succeed by themselves, something internally forbids them to do so alone. Both Claire and Lottar depend on men for emotional support and happiness. Lottar realizes her reliance on the Franciscan when he is leading her to freedom. Munro writes, “She had not understood how much she depended on the smell of his skin, the aggrieved determination of his long strides, the flourish of his black mustache” (The Albanian Virgin 109). Similarly to Lottar, Claire idolized “[Nelson’s] skin and his smell and his forbidden eyes” (Carried Away 115). The female characters were enthralled with the men in their lives. Gale Harris, author of “Radiant, Vanishing Consolations” attributes the women’s dependence on a need for a sexual and sensual connection. She says, “But women often succumb to men because they long for passion. At the prospect of love, Louise feels “‘a hush, a flutter along the nerves, a bowing down of sense, a flagrant prostration’”… Lottar calls the man who rescues her from the tribe “Xoti” or “master” and experiences his departure as “taking the breath out of her body” (Harris). Harris credits a woman’s need for a man on passion and seems to feel they need to express their sense of sensuality. That is why, although the long for freedom, Lottar and Claire flourish on the Franciscan and Nelson’s bodily characteristics that they link to sexuality.
Miriam Marty Clark, in her criticism “Allegories of reading in Alice Munro’s Carried Away” also links Louisa’s actions to passion and spirit. She writes, “The unauthorized and the anarchic, read under the sign of the feminine as erotic desire -- evoked by Jack's letters and frustrated by his death, then repressed, domesticated -- emerge with dizzying force twice in Louisa's life, once just after her encounter with Jim Frarey and a second time, many years later” (Clark). Louisa was aroused with “exotic desire” when she had her sexual encounter with Jim than again when she saw Jack again during his union rally. She’s dependent on men to make her feel sexually alive.
Writer Susan Heeger explains their desires in a different way in her book review by saying “Salvation from a life of drudgery may come in the form of a wealthy man or an exotic trip or simply a job in another town. But more important than any opportunity are the guts to seize it, to engage in a search for meaning instead of settling for, as one Munro character puts it, “flimsy choices, arbitrary days” (Heeger). This puts some of Louisa’s other choices in perspective because she moves to a new town to escape a disastrous relationship and to try something new. She has the guts to quit her current occupation as a traveling saleswoman and settles into a new position. Louisa then marries the owner of the piano factory who is considered a very wealthy and influential man, after her love Jack was killed in an accident. Although it is never inferred that Louisa loves Arthur, she still escapes from her life as the lonely town librarian and emerges as the wife of the riches man in town. Louisa does not seem to depend on Arthur particularly, for passion or love, such as Gale Harris suggests, but merely to avoid “a life of drudgery” (Heeger) as Susan Heeger suggests.
Claire also circumvents a boring life with Donald by cheating on him with Nelson, who was a “shy, twenty-two-year-old student… [but] not shy in love” (The Albanian Virgin 111). This signifies that Heeger’s theory comes into play because Claire is trying to gain a better love interest and ultimately a better existence. However, she leaves Nelson as well when they expose their relationship to their spouses. This change was different than cheating on Donald because she continues to yearn for Nelson even when she reaches her destination proving Harris’s hypothesis regarding passion. Both situations of Louisa’s and Claire’s dependence on men can be attributed to either Harris’s and Heeger’s contrasting theories.
Even though Louisa, Claire, and Lottar are dependent on men for many reasons, they also demonstrate signs of attempting independence. This ambivalence is a phenomenon that seems very familiar. I recognize the traits Munro’s female characteristics exhibit in myself and I think many of Open Secrets’ readers can identify with them too. So does depending on someone other than yourself show weak character? Do Munro’s characters lack the capacity to be completely independent? I think that although Munro’s heroines seem to depend on men, despite their attempt to succeed by themselves, is simply realistic. Their efforts at maintaining a self-sufficient life shows that they are strong women, but they simply suffer the same plight that most men and women do. Arthur Doud explains his attraction to Louisa as a “scorch of electricity” and “burnt orange” (Munro 40). It seems that the women’s dependence on men is a realistic internal feeling that many cannot stop. It is nature’s way for women and men to depend on each other to fill a void they have in their lives. Munro just seems to concentrate on women’s voids rather than explore men’s desires. She may want to display that women are strong and independent but have an ambivalence that nature will not let them forget.
Acknowledgements
My final essay could not have been written without the contributions of several people. First and foremost, I would like to thanks the class for our uplifting and influential discussions. They helped me sort out my priorities that I should include in my essay. I would also like to thank my peer editors, Brianne Richards, Melissa Weiner, and Stephen Cioffi for proofreading my essays. The criticism authors were also extremely helpful for providing insight on Alice Munro’s novel Open Secrets.
Works Cited
Beran, Carol L. “Thomas Hardy, Alice Munro, and the Question of Influence.”
American Review of Canadian Studies. Summer 1999 v29 i2 pNA. 1999. IConn.org. April 25, 2006.
Clark, Miriam Marty. “Allegories of Reading in Alice Munro’s “Carried Away.”
Contemporary Literature: University of Wisconsin Press. Spring 1996 v37 n1 p49(13). Literature Resource Center. April 23, 2006.
Harris, Gale. “Radiant, Vanishing Consolations.” Belles Lettres. Spring 1995. Vol. 10, Iss 2; pg 10.May 3, 2006. Proquest.
<http://blackboard.quinnipiac.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_34870_1&frame=top
Heeger, Susan. “Pluck, Luck and Destiny Alice Munro's short story characters live on in the mind long after the tale has been told.” Los Angeles Time. Oct. 30, 1994. Proquest. April 22, 2006.
Munro, Alice. “The Albanian Virgin.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage, 1994. 81-128
---------------. “Carried Away.”---------------------------------------------------------------
The Closed Secrets in Open Secrets
Czepiel
English 102 Sec 68
4/24/06
The Closed Secrets in Open Secrets
Alice Munro is a writer that uses an unconventional style of writing in order to draw her readers into her text. In the two stories that we read of hers, I have noticed several techniques that set her apart from her colleagues. She enjoys writing about topics that seem traditional, but she writes about them in an untraditional way, and for an untraditional reason, “When I started to write, I wrote about things that puzzled me—death, love, all the obvious concerns that tend to confuse us throughout our lives” (Meanjin). So many writers write about topics such as these, but Munro seems to blend the topics of death and love into the same story, in a way that will grasp the reader’s attention in a way that many authors can not.
We began with reading “Carried Away,” a love story about a young woman, Louisa, who had fallen in love with a soldier, Jack Agnew, fighting in the war overseas, through a series of letters. Throughout the story Munro would bring the letters into the text, the thing that I found so strange about this is how she brought them in. There were no introductions to these letters, and no closings to them, they had just been thrown into the text in italics. There was no way to tell when the letters had been written either, as they were not dated. The first time through this was somewhat confusing to read. As the text continued the letters did too, from time to time, they would be two consecutive letters with nothing between them, leaving the reader to decipher what is going on in the text. This seems to be Munro’s intent, as she is quoted saying, “go back over and over again and mine the same material and look at it in different ways…” (Carrington 1). Munro wants the reader to feel as though there is more significance in the text than just the words on the page, which is why she wants her readers to go through her works more than once. I believe she is doing the same thing in “The Albanian Virgin” when she does not explain that Lottar and Charlotte are the same people. What She is trying to do is get the reader to go back over the text and try to see if Lottar and Charlotte are the same people, or if Lottar is a character that is made up by Charlotte as a movie character.
How the letter writing sequence got started is another question that needs to be answered. Jack was a frequent visitor to the library before he got sent overseas, although he had been there many times, Louisa did not know who he was, it wasn’t until she received his first letter that she became curious as to who this man is who had an attraction to her. At first it seems as though Jack is homesick and is looking for a pen pal to keep his mind off the war. Then the story begins to take a turn, Jack asks Louisa in one of the letters if she is single, and follows it with his delight when he finds out she is. So why does Munro create this relationship controversy, as stated previously, she would like the reader to go back and reread it, and try to get themselves inside the story as opposed to just reading the words off the page.
Another interesting thing about Munro’s writing is that she is somewhat put-offish about some things that would seem like a major issue to the reader, there is an example of this in both of the stories, in “Carried Away” Grace, the wife of Jack seems too preoccupied to talk to Jim Doud. She is talking to the housekeeper about keeping the children out of the house because they are dirty. She exhibits this trait in her writing in “The Albanian Virgin” also, right from the beginning when Lottar is taken by the natives of the mountains, “…she was lying in a small stone hut that was an out-building of the big house, called the kula. It was the hut of the sick and dying” (Munro 82). That seemed very put offish, there is no telling of what is going through Lottar’s mind at this time, is she in pain, is she scared, is she comfortable? This is a somewhat confusing trait that is encompassed in her writing, because in “Northern Exposures” she is very open with Daphne Merkin talking about her children, her mother, her husband and even her ex-husband. “She says that she considers herself ‘enormously lucky’ in both of her spouses and is ‘eternally grateful’ to her first husband (he has also remarried) for believing in her writing enough to let her attend to it in the time she had ‘left over from my duties’ (Merkin 4). Munro is a different person on the pages than she is in real life, but what makes her interesting is she is more vague in her writing than she is in person, as opposed to expressing herself on the page and being a quiet person in the interview. I believe that Merkin was pleasantly surprised by Munro’s outgoing personality, “‘I still haven’t claimed to be a writer,’ Alice Munro observes at our first meeting, less than 10 minutes into what will turn out to be a very long and companionable lunch” (Merkin 2). It seemed like Merkin thought she would be having a quick interview with an author that, pleasantly surprisingly turned into an afternoon ordeal that she made a friend through.
While reading her stories I sort of felt that the characters in her stories did not come off as real people. Though her stories are a somewhat contemporary fiction, the people seem to have feelings that do not seem to be well developed. For some reason I feel very disconnected from the characters, as a reader I felt as though I was an outsider looking in on the story taking place, as opposed to feeling like I was in the story. She does not provide a description of the characters that creates a colorful picture in my mind. It is almost as if the characters and the story are being explained like a black and white movie, leaving a lot for the reader to imagine. Other than the town librarian, who is Louisa? What is she like? What does she look like? The first mentioning of Louisa is, “Louisa opened the letter that arrived that day from overseas” (Munro 3). We then find out that she is twenty five, two pages later, but that is all we know. Merkin notices this as well, “Munro, whose fictional approach is rooted in a process of incremental disclosure, of a gradual peeling away of layers in order to get closer to an approximate emotional truth…” (Merkin 3). The underdevelopment of her characters is a technique that Munro uses to either try to get her readers to get themselves deeper inside the stories by “peeling away layers”, or maybe she wants to leave the image of the characters up to the reader and give the reader freedom to put whatever face they want on the characters. This way if the reader feels like they can relate to the story then they can imagine themselves in the story. Louisa is not the only main character that is under developed. Lottar, Charlotte, the main character in “The Albanian Virgin” also has a very vague description, we start off knowing that Lottar is trapped in the mountains of the Maltsia e madhe, and that she had a bad gash on her leg because she fell on some rocks when her tour party was ambushed by a group of natives. What Lottar looks like is a mystery to the reader we, what her personality is like, once again, a mystery to the reader. The reader is really able to “peal away layers” in “The Albanian Virgin” with Lottar. From the start we know nothing of this woman, but as the story goes on we learn of her will to survive with the tribe, she even allows herself to be exiled in hopes that the Franciscan will help her get back to a place where she can get back on a boat to Canada, in order to do this she had to swear that she would never go with a man. Lottar follows the Franciscan’s instructions very closely, even in such an unfamiliar environment and never panics, all while making huge personal sacrifices.
The story then switches plots and we (the readers) are left reading about this woman Charlotte, who is in a hospital room, and we find out is telling the story of Lottar. This leaves the reader in an interesting place. Lottar is representing Charlotte in the story she is telling Claire, the narrator, for a movie she is thinking up. The reader does not quite have that figured out yet. “Lottar being an incomplete anagram of Charlotte, the reader then surmises that this character from the Claire story is the same person many years later, but then that very character creates a doubt by saying to Claire: ‘I’ve been making up a story, for a movie’” (Colvile 1). The Claire story is Colvile’s way of breaking “The Albanian Virgin into two stories. The Lottar story is the story which Charlotte is telling and is using for a movie idea, the Claire story is the story being told by the narrator. So now Munro has two stories going on in one, neither with very much detail and the reader is left to decipher which story they are in at the present time.
Munro’s different style of writing does not always appeal to people, but she is perfectly fine with that. Some people expect a certain style from Munro, but that is just the problem, her style is not predictable, her sister, called her after reading Open Secrets telling her that she could not stand it, because the ending was not “normal.” Another woman wrote to Munro claiming that Munro broke a trust that had been built up in reading other books that Munro has written. Munro responded to that by saying, “We never had a contract. When I write there is a reader there for me, an imagined ideal reader, someone I'm definitely talking to, but no writer can be handcuffed by reader expectations” (Meanjin). Munro believes that all writers should write this way, that it is important for them to have a target reader in mind, but at the same they can’t cater to the needs and wants of every reader.
As different as Munro’s writing style is, I think that it fits her personality nicely, this is a thought that I have developed after reading “A National Treasure” and “Northern Exposures.” Her writing is very free lance, and it seems as though she just lets the pen flow across the page. “I still write in the corner of the dining room, and I often answer the phone” (Merkin 60). Her style seems as though she writes for the thrill of writing, and the love of the art, she doesn’t seem to write as a job and a means of income. When asked how a story is started, Munro responds with, “Storytelling is continuous. Story doesn’t stop, at least the sort of stories I’m interested in writing” (Meanjin). She is just a woman with a passion for writing.
Works Cited
Carrington, Ildiko de Papp. “What’s in a title? Alice Munro’s ‘Carried Away.’” Studies in Short Fiction. 30.4 (Fall 1993) iCONN.org. 555. 3/31/06. <http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/594/163/81601758w1/purl=rc1_ITOF_0_A14763067&dyn=14!xrn_3_0_A14763067?sw_aep=a13qu>
Colvile, Georgiana MM. “Relating (to) the Spec(tac)ular, Other: Alice Munro’s ‘The Albanian Virgin.’” Commonwealth 21.1 (1998): 83-91.
Meanjin. Interview. A National Treasure. 1995
Merkin, Daphne. “Northern Exposures.” New York Times Magazine 24 October 2004: 58-62.
Munro, Alice. “The Albanian Virgin.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. 81-128.
---. “Carried Away.” Open Secrets. 3-51.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the miscellaneous students of the English 102 class, as well and a special thanks to Ashley Tkowski and Professor Czepiel for helping me put everything together in my head.
Virgin Vs. Virgin
Sarah Hacker
EN 102 – 1:00
Professor Czepiel
May 5, 2006
Essay IV
Virgin vs. Virgin
When hearing the word virginity, one usually thinks of a person and their sexuality. They are new to the experience and in a sense they are losing something that can never be gained back. But can you be a virgin in other ways? Can you gain something from virginity? Experiences shape who we are and who we become. Many of the characters in Alice Munro’s stories fit the mold of this definition. They are female characters, who are experiencing new stages in their lives; they are virgins to these situations. Looking at Alice Munro’s two short stories “Carried Away” and “The Albanian Virgin,” we are introduced to a very contradicting interpretation of the word virgin and gender roles.
In Munro’s story “Carried Away,” Louisa, a young librarian, begins receiving letters from a man she does not even know, Jack Agnew. At first she is skeptical of this strange man writing her letters, but then she begins to really believe in the things he is saying. Her skepticism shows that she is cautious and new to the situation. After numerous letters are exchanged and Louisa becomes more comfortable with Jack, Munro leads the reader to think that she is falling for him. Louisa waits for the day that Jack returns and fulfills the fantasy she has thought up in her head. “Everyday she was sure he would come, everyday she was prepared for him. Sundays were a torment. When she entered the Town Hall she always felt he might be there before her, leaning up against the wall awaiting her arrival” (Carried 16-7). Louisa was so caught up in this fantasy of her and Jack being together, that she takes trips to his house and writes to him about what she sees. She looks through the newspaper, constantly checking the lists of soldiers who have either died or come home safely from the war. As time goes on Louisa gets more anxious, until one day she finds a small note on her desk. It says “I was engaged before I went overseas” (Carried 18). Once she realizes it is from Jack, and her fantasy will never come true, Louisa becomes heartbroken. Louisa’s ability to fall in love with someone she has never even known may be because she has never experienced true love before. Her virginity to love causes her to get “carried away,” or caught up in an idea that doesn’t really exist. Louisa fits the standard definition of a virgin in this story because she is losing something.
Also in “Carried Away” Louisa does lose her actual sexual virginity. Once she learns that Jack is never going to be with her, she confides in a friend named Jim Frarey. It can be said that Jim took advantage of Louisa. She turns to him for support and in her weakened state, he gives her false confidence. As a reader you think that he is sincere in taking interest and offering support until he thinks, “[w]omen after they have told one story on themselves cannot stop from telling another. Drink upsets them in a radical way, prudence is out the window” (Carried 19). This is the initial sign of dominance by Jim. The second is when Louisa “…lets him take her hands [and] half lift her from her chair” (Carried 19). This shows him initiating the relations between them. As they climb the stairs Jim tries to reassure Louisa that everything is fine, showing his dominance and persuasion. The final sign of power comes after the two have sex. Jack says, “‘I never intended for this to make a difference to you’” (Carried 20). Louisa when “[s]he tried to explain the traces of blood on the sheets could be credited to her period, but her words came out with a luxurious nonchalance and could not be fit together” (Carried 20). Jack makes their relation seem casual and insignificant. Instead of Louisa speaking out about losing her virginity she simply hides behind a casual answer. She has lost her innocence and power as a women, she allows herself to be swayed by both Jack and Jim. This strong theme of losing something, when losing virginity, is heavily contradicted by Munro in her story “The Albanian Virgin.”
In the story “The Albanian Virgin” a young woman named Lottar is taken captive by a foreign tribe called the Kula after her guide is shot and killed. Lottar is taken back to the Kula, where she is cared for until she recovers. Upon her recovery, Lottar begins to take on the roles of the women in the tribe; working in the tobacco and corn fields is part of her new everyday routine. After spending a long time as a female member of the tribe the women try forcing her to marry a Muslim man. The priest refuses to let such a thing happen and encourages her to become a “virgin.” A virgin by definition of the Kula tribe is
…a woman who had become like a man. She did not want to marry, and she took an oath in front of witnesses that she never would, and then she put on men’s clothes and had her own gun, and her own horse if she could afford one, and she lived as she liked. Usually she was poor, she had no woman to work for her (Albanian 90).
Lottar agrees to the offer given by the priest, and is now only a “virgin” in the eyes of Kula. By becoming a Kula “virgin” Lottar is different from Louisa because she is gaining her independence, where as Louisa was losing hers. She lives on her own, away from the other members of the tribe. She must learn to fend for herself and create a new life. She must build her own shelter and protect herself. She has no else to help her, she is on her own.
Although both women are virgins to life experiences, there is a strong contradiction as to the definition of the word virgin in these two stories. Looking at this conflict I notice that both have to do with women gaining and losing something. “Carried Away” shows a loss of power and innocence. Louisa allows herself to become consumed by all he men in her life. She becomes infatuated by the idea of Jack, gives her virginity to Jim, and becomes the wife of Arthur. When discussing the different views on the story, critic Carol Beran mentions that “some contemporary writers might have played up the theme of the victimization of Louisa by three males” (Beran 2). This goes along with the theme of male domination in “Carried Away,” and Louisa’s loss of power. Every action that Louisa takes has to involve her feelings towards a man, therefore, she shows no independence. The fact that she allows herself and her feelings to be dictated by a man, puts an interesting aspect on the word virgin in “Carried Away” and “The Albanian Virgin.” Perhaps this is an example of the struggle women face in society. Louisa represents a woman early in society, she allows her life to be influenced and dictated by a man. She is defenseless and weak. Louisa allows Jack’s words to influence the way she leads her life. She does not try to speak out when Jim takes advantage of her. Instead, she tries to hide that fact that she is a virgin. She never shows any sign of strength; she simply succumbs to what the males in her life expect of her. Lottar on the other hand speaks out against being forced into something with a man. She chooses to separate herself from the tribe in order gain independence. Although at times there is a struggle for food and shelter Lottar does what is needed to survive. She is a fighter, unlike Louisa who allows herself to be “victimized” and powerless.
Although Lottar is gaining independence, there is a slight twist. The definition of the Kula virgin depicts a women taking on a role similar to a man. She must do hard labor like men, fend for herself like a man, and she must dress like a man. She is gaining independence, but she conforms to that of a man in order to attain this status. In an interview with Alice Munro she discusses how she discovered the idea to write ‘The Albanian Virgin,” and talks about how she was very intrigued by the idea.
There was this possibility for women that if they opted out of marriage and sex they could become independent. They could be some kind of honorary man. They would be all alone and had to do everything for themselves. But there was the possibility they could reject the traditional role and be just themselves (National 4).
Although she is discussing this is in a positive sense, but when she states that women can become an “honorary man.” We again see male domination. Even though a woman can choose to disregard the “traditional roles” and live life as she pleases, these “traditional roles” are of male dominance. Lottar rejects these roles when she runs away with the Franciscan to reach the British consulate. Even after she has attained some independence she continues to gain even more. By leaving the tribe, then breaking the traditions, shows that Lottar will do anything to achieve full independence.
Being that “Carried Away” takes place many years before the setting of “Albanian Virgin,” the reasoning for the actions of Louisa and Lottar can be related to the time period. During the time of “Carried Away”, women were still not considered equals to men. Where as “[t]he story [The Albanian Virgin] takes place before the 70s feminist revolution and reclaiming of the female body but the novella was written long afterwards…” (Colvile 90). Knowing the time difference among the stories we can make a connection between the two female characters and how Munro uses them to show a change in the female society.
The difference of between the Louisa’s virginity and Lottar’s, represent the lack or loss of power, compared to the gain of strength and independence. Louisa allows her life and choices to be persuaded and dictated by the male figure in her life. Lottar on the other hand, continuously fights for the freedom to be on her own. Munro uses both stories to depict the struggle women face in a male dominated society.
Acknowledgments:
Thank you to Professor Czepiel for her insight and ideas that helped me focus this essay.
Thank you to Caroline Valdini for her peer-revision response.
Thank you to Sarah Eicher for her peer-revisions and editing.
Thank you to Alex Anellie for her editing.
Works Cited
Beran, Carol L. “Thomas Hardy, Alice Munro, and the Question of Influence.” American Review of Canadian Stories. 29 (Summer 1999). Infotrac.com 1-19. 1 May 2006.
Colvile, Georigina. “Relating (to) the Spec(tac)ular Other: Alice Munro’s ‘The Albanian Virgin.’” Commonwealth 21.1 (1998): 83-91.
Munro,
Munro,
----“Carried Away.” Open Secrets. 3 -51.
Obsession
5 May 2006
English 102 (1pm)
Katherine Czepiel
Obsession
Sometimes in life we want something so bad that we are blinded from the truth. We only see what we want to, and this causes us to become so consumed in one thing that we miss out on opportunities. When we become obsessed with something, it takes over our lives and we tend to make mistakes that change things. The sacrifices that we make are because we do not think clearly about the consequences until it is too late. In the short story, “Carried Away,” we are told of a story of a character that overwhelms herself so much with something that she makes many sacrifices.
In “Carried Away,” the main character, Louisa becomes so obsessed with a man by the name of Jack that all she can think about is him. Jack is a soldier, who randomly writes her a letter, admiring her for being a librarian. He tells her in one of his letters; “We exchanged a smile” (Carried 7). Louisa has no idea who Jack is, other than what he tells her in the letters, but Jack seems to remember this small detail that they smiled at each other once. This is only the beginning of Louisa’s infatuation with the soldier that she has never met before.
Feelings between them start to develop when Jack tells Louisa, “So I will say I love you. I think of you up on a stool at the Library reaching to put a book away and I come up and put my hands on your waist and lift you down…” (Carried 11). This intimate thought that Jack shares with the librarian is a sign that he admires her for more than just a librarian. He has feelings for her. He told her that he loved her, and those are very strong words.
The last letter that Jack writes to Louisa is the one where he tells her he loves her. Even after there are no more letters, Louisa continues to think about Jack and talks to a friend, Jim Frarey about him. She admits to her friend that she kept the Library opened for a personal reason during the Spanish Flu (Carried 15). Her personal reason was because she is waiting for Jack to come around and find her. This is a sacrifice she made because she could have endangered her life and others. Germs could have been spread around, and she herself could have gotten much sicker.
Louisa spends all her time in the Library waiting for Jack to come. Although this is her job, and she works everyday, she thinks about him all the time. She makes the sacrifice of not getting to know any other men because she is so hooked on Jack. She isolates herself by being in the Library so much because she is waiting for his return from the war. Then one day, there is a note on her desk. It reads, “I was engaged before I went overseas” (Carried 18).
Soon, Louisa lets this message take over her life completely because “[i]t was at this time that she entirely gave up on reading. The covers of books looked like coffins to her…” (Carried 17). Reading is a part of Louisa’s life. She works with books every day and is very knowledgeable with literature when she was writing Jack. Some of their conversation had been about specific authors. For her to give up something that she is passionate about shows that her obsession is taking over everything she does.
Through another one of Alice Munro’s stories, “The Jack Randa Hotel,” we see how someone gives up their life so easily for something they want so badly. Gail, the main character, has a very good friend named Will. They have been friends for a very long time, and Gail falls in love with him during this friendship. When Will falls in love with another woman named Sandy, and they move to Australia, Gail decides to follow them. She wants to see where they live.
Gail ends up sacrificing her life in Canada, to move to Australia. She even goes as far to sell her shop. With the money she receives, “…she got herself onto a flight to Australia and did not tell anyone where she was going” (Jack 168-9). She leaves her entire life behind to follow someone she loves. This also means that she sacrifices looking for other men, just like Louisa. They are both so concentrated on one man, they do not realize there are others out there.
Not only does Gail move to Australia, but once she finds Will and Sandy’s house and “finds a letter there, just as she had thought it might be. She puts it into her purse” (Jack 171). Will has been writing to a woman with the same last name as him to ask if they were relatives. Gail opens the letter and writes back to Will as this woman, not realizing that this woman has died. Gail’s obsession overcomes her and causes her to take actions that will hurt her in the future. She does not think her consequences through.
Munro is not the only author to write about obsession. Margaret Atwood wrote a story called, “Death by Landscape.” In this story, Lois is a grown woman. Her obsession is over the paintings that she keeps in her apartment. They are not just any paintings, but are paintings of landscapes. She is obsessed with finding her friend Lucy who disappears on a camping trip when they are thirteen. Lois “…bought [the paintings] because she wanted them. She wanted something that was in them, although she could not have said at the time what it was” (Atwood 1095-6). She subconsciously buys the paintings because she thinks she will be able to find her friend Lucy in them.
The sacrifice made by Lois was that she shuts herself away from the world and only concentrates on her hope that Lucy is still alive. It has been many years and no remains of Lucy have been found. There is no way she can still be able to survive in the wilderness. Lois is “…relieved not to have to worry about the lawn, or about the ivy pushing its muscular little suckers into the brickwork…” (Atwood 1095). To me, this means that Lois is not taking any joy in taking care of her lawn or planting a garden, which is something that retirees do to keep themselves busy. Her obsession causes her to be lazy and concentrate on only one thing while there are so many other things she could be doing.
Also, through Flannery O’Connor’s story, “Good Country People,” there is another example to help us understand what Louisa is going through in “Carried Away.” This time, it is not about loving someone else. Louisa loves Jack, Gail loves Will, and Lois loves her friend, Lucy. It is more about being loved in this story, and that is Joy-Hulga’s obsession. She is not very loved and accepted by her mother, Mrs. Hopewell. In fact, “Mrs. Hopewell liked to tell people that Glynese and Carramae were two of the finest girls she knew…” (O’Connor 804). Glynese and Carramae are the daughters of Mrs. Freeman. They are young, and have many admirers. They are accepted by Mrs. Hopewell because they do what society wants them to: they are either married or interested in someone.
Joy-Hulga has never been loved or felt important to someone until she meets Manley Pointer, a bible salesman. Joy-Hulga is a thirty year old with a wooden leg from an accident when she was ten, and a bad heart. When Manley meets her, he tells her, ‘“I think you’re brave. I think you’re real sweet…You’re a brave sweet little thing and I liked you the minute I seen you walk in the door”’ (O’Connor 811). To Joy-Hulga, this means a lot. No one has ever treated her nicely before. In fact, her own mother has never said those words to her. She immediately falls for him.
Instead of Joy-Hulga’s obsession lasting for a while and sacrificing time in her life, she sacrifices her first romantic encounter with someone who is only trying to take advantage of her. Manley persuades Joy-Hulga to take off her wooden leg, and she thinks she can trust him, so she lets him remove her leg. When she objects, he tells her, ‘“Leave it off for a while. You got me instead’” (O’Connor 815). He wants her to trust him so he can take advantage of her.
All these characters have misread something. Louisa believes that she will find Jack and they will be together until she finds out that he already has a fiancée. Jack never tells her this in his letters. He makes it sound as though he is looking for someone. Her first mistake was when she begins to have feelings for someone she does not even know and has never met. She does not realize that there are other people out there for her.
Eventually, she does get married to a man named Arthur Doud. Arthur was Jack’s boss at the piano factory, and when Jack dies in a terrible accident, he offers help and brings the books back that Jack has borrowed from the library. Through total coincidence, he meets Louisa and they become involved, although one can argue that it is not love. His proposal to her is totally nonchalant and is mentioned in a normal conversation. He says, ‘“I wish we could get married”’ (Carried 41). It is as if Louisa has married the first man who comes around because she is getting older and her time to find someone decent is running out.
In a way, because of Louisa’s obsession, she does not win in the end. She decides to marry someone random because she wastes so much time trying to find Jack and begin a relationship with him. When he passes away, she marries the first man to ask her without really getting to know him very well.
At the end of “The Jack Randa Hotel,” Gail does not win either. Will ends up finding out it is her who is writing the letters and pretending to be the woman he thought is his cousin. When she returns to the apartment, she finds a note that reads, “Gail. I know it’s you” (Jack 188). She ends up running away. She decides that “[s]he must take the money out of the bank, get herself to the airport, find a flight. Her clothes can stay behind—her humble pale-print dresses, her floppy hat” (Jack 188). She does not hesitate to leave the new place she has just settled into.
Gail’s obsession causes her to leave where she lives twice. She also could lose her very close friend if she runs away because he might be very angry with her that she deceives him. Her actions are not beneficial to the ending of her story because she is sacrificing so many things and will not be happy in the end.
Lois ends up spending her days inside her house alone, in the living room looking at the paintings. There are so many other things to do, such as, “…go out, go downstairs, do some shopping; there isn’t much in the refrigerator…But she isn’t hungry, and moving, stirring from this space, is increasingly an effort” (Atwood 1105). Lois gives up everything in life; even going out of the house because she is so infatuated with trying to find out where Lucy is in a bunch of paintings. In a way, Lois also loses everything because she has no one else other than her pictures, and cannot even move from sitting in the living room. Also, the pictures do not get Lois any closure to losing her friend because there is no way that Lucy can still be alive.
Manley Pointer leaves Joy-Hulga alone, and probably feeling violated. He left her, “…sitting on the straw in the dusty sunlight” (O’Connor 816). Joy-Hulga loses something physical because Manley takes her leg with him. She is too helpless to even move from where she is because she only has one leg. Her obsession with wanting to feel loved ends up making her unhappy in the end. Her decision to allow Manley to become intimate with her will scar her forever because he takes advantage of her. She might never be able to trust a man again.
All of these stories help to show what Louisa is going through in “Carried Away.” All the characters see only what they want to because they are obsessed over something. Obsession drives them to make terrible decisions that in the end make them unhappy. If they had kept a more open mind and allowed them to see what else is out there, they could have had a much happier ending. Munro, Atwood, and O’Connor try to convey to their readers that obsessing over something leaves you alone and miserable.
Works Cited
Atwood, Margaret. “Death By Landscape.” Thinking and Writing About Literature. Ed.
Michael Meyer. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001. 1095-1106.
Munro, Alice. “Carried Away.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. 3-51.
--------------. “The Jack Randa Hotel.” Open Secrets. 161-189.
O’Conner, Flannery. “Good Country People.” Thinking and Writing About Literature.
Ed. Michael Meyer. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001. 803-816.
Acknowledgements:
I would like to thank Professor Czepiel for taking the time to read my paper and E-mail me back with answers to any questions I had and also for suggesting to read “The Jack Randa Hotel.” I would also like to thank Wesley Kyle for taking the time to peer edit my paper and make suggestions.
I would like to think Sarah Hacker for taking the time out of her busy schedule and reading my paper one last time to help me with any grammatical errors. She also helped read over my works cited list to make sure all my sources were correctly cited.
Sunday, May 07, 2006
Secrets
English 102-1:00pm
5 May 2006
Czepiel; Final Draft
Secrets
Alice Munro has carefully entitled her collection of stories “Open Secrets”. Her choice of a title summarizes her main theme and insinuates an underlying meaning to her work. Within “Carried Away” and “The Albanian Virgin,” Munro pushes her readers to use his/her imaginations in order to create their own endings. Perhaps these unlocked endings and insinuations can be seen as “secrets” that are held within the text. “Munro's stories show "truth" to be a shifting, subjective thing…Over the course of "Open Secrets," these bits add up. Layers of secrecy and deception are pulled away, revealing more and more about people and their community-and the conflicts between the two” (Heeger). A third story by Munro called “Open Secrets” suggests these themes as well. Munro leaves us always wanting more and raises many questions; who are these secrets between? Are they merely between the characters within each story? Or perhaps the secrets lay between the author herself and us as the readers, and if so, what are Munro’s reasons for doing this? The answers remain unknown until readers of Alice Munro’s works look deeply into her thoughts.
It is important to note Alice Munro’s intentions for creating a writing style that includes complicated and out of sequence storylines. The purpose of “hiding” certain key points within the story is Munro’s way of forcing her readers to look more closely into the text to determine what is meant based on his/her personal beliefs. “There is a way in which, when the stories intersect in their similarities, they shed light as well as shadow on each other. The intersections may give us new perspectives on the stories, but they also reveal that our understanding may still be limited and our view obscured” (Foy para 3). Intertwining themes relating to books, libraries, mysteries behind letters, and hidden identities are all seen throughout Munro’s tales of secretive lives and adventures of the unknown. To interpret these obscurities, the reader must make judgments of his/her own without expecting to find answers with ease. The readers aren’t expected to find them out until further reading and exploring is completed.
The characters in Munro’s pieces possess the ability to withhold many secrets from one another that may be essential to the growth of the story. There is significance in the letters that are being written back and forth between the main characters Jack and Louisa within “Carried Away”. The two characters share a relationship that is more than just a secret love affair. The story comes to a conclusion without definite meaning and we are left to decipher for ourselves whether or not these people were really in love or if it could have been a frustrating battle of absent love within one person’s imagination. After reading Jacks letter informing her of his previous engagement, the secret of the letters is revealed to Louisa. “…she realizes that her sense of being watched was not imaginary” (de Papp Carrington para 7). The man whom she thought of for all this time was truly there in her library with her, and he could not have been a figment of her thoughts and dreams. She may have intentionally been keeping this identity of Jack a secret from herself; this would explain why she never asked for his picture in return for her own. By not asking to see what Jack physically looked like, Louisa allows herself to refer to him as a dream. She is the owner of this internal fantasy which enables her to fill a void in her life that no one else truly knows about. This is something that Munro brings to her readers in the form of a secret hidden inside of Louisa. Munro leaves the secret “open” to assumption and interpretation.
As Charlotte begins to unfold her story of Lottar in “The Albanian Virgin,” speculations are set in motion. Munro suggests the different theories of whether her story is made up by this woman, or if it actually occurred in someone else’s life. Similar to Louisa in “Carried Away,” Charlotte is creating this story to fill an empty void in her life. She is not satisfied with her deprived existence and vagabond-like ways. The character of Lottar is a new start for Charlotte; she is using her for a secret escape. “It was about vanishing. I knew that Charlotte and Gjurdhi had not actually vanished – they were somewhere, living or dead. But for me they had vanished” (Levene para 23;Albanian 126-127). At the conclusion of “The Albanian Virgin,” Charlotte and her husband Gjurdhi vanish from the narrator’s life completely and with no warning. Although they may nothave physically left, their disappearance from Claires life is unexplained and mysterious. These secrets are meant to be held between Alice Munro and her readers, and here she is revealing them, however subtly.
Another parallel that I have that I have questioned is the references to books and libraries and the underlying meaning of this similarity. Within each story, there has been a character who is either a librarian, or who owns a bookstore, yet no matter what the profession is, the main theme contains a passion for books and literature. Here lies yet another issure of “secrets.” The characters from each story may be using the fictional stories as a haven from their real life problems. “Carried Away” suggests that Louisa’s library is what connects her with Jack. This is where he first saw her, and this is where she would sit and wait for his return every day. Louisa possesses a strong imagination for her books and an even stronger imagination for her love life. Books are left for the mind to interpret in many ways, and so is Louisa’s life
“The Albanian Virgin” reveals it’s narrator as Claire, the owner of a small bookstore. Claire’s bookstore is the connection between herself and Charolotte and Gjurdhi because it is where they have met and continue their friendship. Charlotte and Claire show a bond between the books which is how they become so close. Claire holds secrets of her own within her books as she hides behind them in order to escape the realities of her own love life. Here in her bookstore she also sits and waits for the one who once loved her. The question continues as whether he is truly real, of merely a figment of her vibrant imagination. “I had taken all this care, and now what? Now I waited, and I felt like somebody who had got dramatically dressed up for a party…only to discover that it was just a few neighbors playing cards” (Albanian 105). The profit that Claire may gain from opening this bookstore is of unimportance; what she truly cares about is waiting for someone to walk through that door. Who this person is, is a secret kept between Munro and her readers.
The short story of “Open Secrets” gives another parallel to the themes within Munro’s two other stories. The story unfolds as a young group of girls venture into the woods for their annual camping trip, held by the “Canadian Girls in Training”. Heather Bell vanishes soon after the hike has begun, and the mysterious events continue as Munro jumps ahead to the other girls discussing Heather’s disappearance in the future. Munro is using the same techniques of complicated timelines. She does this once again to incorporate hints into the reader’s imaginations. “Soon it vanished, her bold body vanished inside this ample one, and she became a studious, shy girl, a blusher. She developed the qualities her husband would see and value when hiring and proposing” (Open Secrets 139). One of the girls, Maureen, is now married and holds secrets of her own, which she does not share with any of the characters. Munro reveals to us how she puts on a façade about whom she really is and how she hides her emotions from her husband. Munro does so subtly enough so that is it not clearly recognized at first glance. It is almost as though Maureen is simply going through the motions of her daily routine as a wife, and at night she realizes how unhappy she is with this man in her life. These are hidden truths that only she knows about.
Alice Munro has given us many opportunities to look deeply into her works and decipher for ourselves between hidden truths and subtle guidelines that push us into the direction of creating our own endings. She develops themes of keeping secrets between characters within each of the three stories, along with secrets that are held between herself as an author and her readers. By formulating her ideas into complicated time lines and intertwining characters, Munro is forcing her readers to make their own personal decisions and to raise and answer questions that will expand their mind further, grasping the material as much as possible.
Works Cited
De Papp Corrington, Ildiko. “What's in a title? Alice Munro's ‘Carried Away.’” iConn, the Conneticut Digital Library 30.4 (Fall 1993). InfoTrac 1-555. April 2006.
http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark
Foy, Nathalie. “’Darkness Collecting’: Reading ‘Vandals’ as a coda to Open Secrets.” Essays on Canadian Writing 66 (Winter 1998). ProQuest 1-22. April 2006.
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Heeger, Sarah. “Book Review: Open Secrets.” Los Angeles Times (pre- 1997 Fulltext). ProQuest 2. April 2006. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Levene, Mark. “’It Was About Vanishing’: A Glimpse of Alice Munro’s Stories.” University of Toronto Quarterly 68.4 (Fall, 1999). UTPJournals.com. 1-15. April 3, 2006. http://www.utpjournals.com/product/utq
Munro, Alice. “Albanian Virgin.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
81-128.
---------------- “Carried Away.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.3-51.
---------------- “Open Secrets.” Open Secrets. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my friend Damian Caputo for allowing me to read my essay out loud to him. By doing this, I was able to hear my grammatical mistakes and make the appropriate adjustments to fix them.
I am giving gratitude to my peers from my English class also. During many sessions of in class peer editing, they noted additional errors of mine and offered their assistance in the developing of my paper.
My last acknowledgement is towards Professor Czepiel for editing my first draft to my essay and answering the questions I asked. Also, my paper was used during a peer editing session in a different class, whose comments have helped me make my final revisions.